Ignore fetch info if it starts with POST

[medwards]

I haven't gotten the tests to pass, I get:

  File "/home/medwards/forks/GitPython/git/test/lib/asserts.py", line 16, in <module>
    'assert_mode_755'] + tools.__all__
AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute '__all__'

Where tools is from from nose import tools

So that's great.

I also haven't manually tested this but based on output I copied and pasted into #94 it should at least fix my part of the problem.

[MatMoore]

Hi, I noticed this has been open for 4 months now - is there anything I can do to get it merged more quickly?

I seem to be running into the same problem when I try to call remote.fetch(tags=True) over HTTPS on version 0.3.2 RC1, and this looks like it would fix the problem.

Michael, I ran into the same problem when trying to run the tests but upgrading my version of nosetests solved it. I'm still getting a lot of failures, but I don't know if it's due to my local setup as earlier commits fail too.

[MatMoore]

Actually, I'm wrong, my problem is fixed by the following two commits on the 0.3 branch, but they're not released yet...
8c2e872
0b820e6

[medwards]

Ah yeah, sorry, but unless my guess is off GitP is dead or near to dead. In
the end, rather than wait for 0.3 to be released (which if you look at the
timestamps could have been a long time ago) I just refactored my code to
use subprocess and commandline git. Good luck man.

On 21 June 2013 12:55, Mat notifications@github.com wrote:

Actually, I'm wrong, my problem is fixed by the following two commits on
the 0.3 branch, but they're not released yet
8c2e8728c2e872
0b820e60b820e6

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/97#issuecomment-19809633
.

[MatMoore]

That's a shame if true, it's a great library.

I'd prefer not to mess around with subprocess if I can avoid it. My current plan is to just monkey patch that method, but I'll probably rethink that approach if it becomes more hassle than parsing command line output myself.

[Byron]

Thank you.
This fix, by now, has already been merged using a slightly different implementation. It should be included on the latest release on pypi as well.