gh-96478: Test @overload on C functions#96479
Conversation
0355a7f to
189797f
Compare
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com>
|
Thanks @sobolevn for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
|
Sorry @sobolevn and @JelleZijlstra, I had trouble checking out the |
|
Thanks @sobolevn for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
|
GH-96604 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <Alex.Waygood@Gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit f177f6f) Co-authored-by: Nikita Sobolev <mail@sobolevn.me>
|
I think this may be the cause of some buildbot failures. In particular, on the second repetition of the test suite (e.g., when running -R3:3), I get this: cc @pablogsal |
|
Fixed in #96615 |
|
Ah my bad, thanks! |
Right, all Refleaks 3.11 buildbots are failing since commit 2a5e333: the 3.11 branch also needs PR #96615 fix. => I created PR #97601 backport to fix test_typing in the 3.11 branch. |
Now, we have this covered, including a side-effect.
@overloaddecorator on compiled functions is not tested #96478